Skip to main content

Last week a case was published in Cycling Weekly involving a lady in the centre of London who walked into the path of a cyclist crossing a road, while looking at her mobile phone.

The judge in the civil court found the cyclist 50% liable for the losses suffered by the pedestrian.

Recently, I also had my own claim settled also on the basis of a 50/50 settlement.

I was commuting to work in day light, proceeding in slow moving traffic in the centre of Warrington.

A car coming up behind me turned right across me into a side street on the left, having overtaken and allegedly indicated the very last second cutting me up in the process and causing damage to my bike and injury to me.

The driver denied fault.

I have gone over the incident in my own mind repeatedly since it happened and can honestly say I don’t think I could have possibly avoided being hit.

Even if the driver had indicated, because it happened during the turn, I was blind to it anyway.

The only way I might have avoided being hit is stopping close to where the side street was on the left, just in case some driver might overtake and indicate in the same manoeuvre!

This would mean cyclists stopping repeatedly on any journey and would make a mockery of The Highway Code, which is there to protect all road users.

It was settled 50/50 only because it was my word against the driver.

The truth is I also know from my own legal work that there are plenty of judges who don’t favour cyclists and, whilst I would hope to have won 100% on Liability had the matter proceeded to trial, there was no guarantee of this as graphically illustrated by the case in London above.

In another recent article, I mentioned how I am almost always having to manoeuvre around dangerous drivers on my daily commute.

At a particular point on the return journey, when I approach a particular turnoff to a cul de sac on my left, cars just pull out as if I am not there…almost every day!

What do all these actual real life cases and examples have in common?

They demonstrate just how invisible cyclists are to car drivers.

We use the same roads, obey the same rules and have the same duty of care as all road users but our physical presence is so often just simply ignored.

The fact that it is broad daylight or if in the dark we are kitted out with lights making us look like Christmas trees makes no difference apparently.

If you have found yourself in a similar situation to myself or the lady featured in the recent Cycling Weekly article which has led to an accident, I invite you to speak with myself or another Cycling Accident Claims legal expert – phone 0800 093 6313 today.

Share this blog

Check out some more of our blogs…

5 Cycling Tips to Get Started

If you’re wanting to get into cycling, you may want to note down these cycling…
3 April 2024

5 Tips for Commuting to Work

Commuting to work by bike doesn’t have to be stressful, it can actually be quite…
20 March 2024

What Information Do I Need to Provide for a Cycle Accident Claim?

We often get questions about what information you need to provide when you start a…
5 March 2024

What our clients say about
Cycle Accident  Claims Management.

After a nasty cycle accident we placed our trust to CACM. Jan Canter and his very efficient team talked us through the procedure. The complete journey from post-accident to settlement was very smooth, painless and we are very happy with the result CACM supplied us with. A job well done by a very professional company.

Jill M. - Gloucester

I was involved in a cycling accident and CACM have acted efficiently and courteously throughout my case. They are busy but despite this they were very good at returning my calls. I was also very satisfied with the outcome of my claim. I would recommend them highly.

Thorstein V. - Manchester

Friendly, explanatory and supportive service from beginning to end. CACM supported me through a bicycle injury involving a car. Fantastic experience throughout an uncertain time. Cannot recommend highly enough. Thank you!

Gemma R. - Hertford